Sector Capability · Rail and Transit

Rail and Transit Construction Scheduling

Open on the date the board was told, and know a year ahead if you will not. CPM Pros builds and keeps Primavera P6 schedules for rail and transit work: baselines and monthly updates built to the transit agency's specification for the contractors who owe them, and independent schedule review for the agencies and owner's representatives who have to answer for the date. Float reported by funding milestone, integration testing modeled at its real density, outages and permits shown as the risks they are. Fully remote, anywhere in the US. Written quote with a firm price and delivery date, typically within 3 business days.

Send the Spec or the XER Independent schedule review → Call 206-719-2053
867
Days late: the SR 99 tunnel, after one TBM stoppage
3 yrs
East Link opened past its ST3 target
$900M+
Claims and counterclaims across three Seattle megaprojects
30+
Years building, reviewing and defending schedules
What Your Schedule Does for You

The schedule already knows.
Report what it knows.

A baseline the agency accepts, built to its own spec
Transit agencies review a baseline against their schedule specification: cost and resource loading, the agency's activity coding, interface milestones with adjacent contracts, outage windows as activities, a narrative with every submittal. The baseline is built to that section and revised until the agency accepts it, so your first update goes in on time and your first pay application is not held for the schedule.
Float reported by funding milestone, not just the opening date
Public rail is paced by money as much as by construction. Grant agreement conditions, appropriations and local commitments become milestones in the schedule, and each month shows the float left on the path to each one. A path losing ten days a month is reported at month two, while re-sequencing or bridge funding is still a cheap decision.
Integration testing at the density it really has
Train control, communications, traction power, stations, fare systems and vehicles come together in hundreds of dependent steps. Shown as a few long bars, they hide every upstream slip until the last season. Modeled step by step and tied to each system's readiness, they warn a year early instead of a month late.
Outages, utilities and permits as risks, not dots
A lost weekend track outage costs whatever the gap to the next window is, not two days. Utility relocations, environmental review, historic consultation and permit windows are scheduled as processes with owners, durations and the conditions that could reopen them, with the work they release tied behind them.
Every update answered in the window the contract gives you
Contractors get a dated written response to each agency comment and each adjacent contractor's slip. Agencies get a written finding on each contractor update before the monthly report is assembled. Either way, the record is in place when a date moves, which is what a time extension or a claim is decided on.
A monthly report that says what the schedule says
Boards and funding partners are usually shown one date, a percent complete and a risk list. The narrative that goes with each update tells them which paths consumed float, what drove it, and what decision is open this month, in plain language a non-scheduler can act on.
Scheduling Services

What we do on
rail and transit programs

Contractors send the schedule specification, contract milestones and drawings. Agencies and owner's representatives send the contractor's XER and narrative, or the program schedule and the last two monthly reports. You get a written quote with a firm price and delivery date, typically within 3 business days. No Primavera P6 license and no scheduler to hire.

Cost- and resource-loaded Primavera P6 baselines built to the transit agency's schedule specification and coding structure
Monthly schedule updates with the written narrative the agency requires, on the contract's reporting cycle
Independent review of contractor baselines and updates for agencies, program managers and owner's representatives
Program schedule review: float by funding milestone, integration testing density, outage and permit modeling, and what the monthly report should say
Interface and systems integration schedules across multiple contracts, from civil and track through systems, testing and revenue service
Fragnets, time impact analysis (TIA) and forensic delay analysis for outages lost, differing site conditions and multi-contractor delay

Rail and Transit Work We Schedule

Light Rail ExtensionsHeavy Rail and Commuter RailStations and PlatformsBored and Cut-and-Cover TunnelsElevated Guideway and BridgesTrack, Traction Power and SystemsMaintenance Facilities and YardsBus Rapid TransitStation Area and Utility Relocation
How It Works

Three questions
a transit schedule should answer every month

01
How much float is left on the path to each funding milestone?
Not only to revenue service. A grant agreement condition, an appropriation or a local match each has its own path through the schedule, and each path has a trend. The month it starts losing float is the month the decision is cheap.
02
Is integration testing modeled at the density it will actually have?
If testing and start-up are a handful of bars, the answer is no, and the opening date is absorbing slips nobody can see. Each test should sit behind the readiness of every system it depends on, across every contract that supplies one.
03
Are outages, utilities and reviews shown as what they are?
A process that can reopen, slip or be lost is not a milestone. When each is an activity with an owner, a duration and a next-available-window, the schedule prices a missed window before it is missed.
Reference Papers and Articles

What three Seattle megaprojects
wrote into their schedules

Case studies and articles on rail and transit schedules, written for agency program staff, owner's representatives and the contractors who build the work. The PDFs are free to download; more reference papers are in the Technical Library.

Questions Agencies and Contractors Ask
Who hires CPM Pros on rail and transit work?

Two kinds of client. General contractors and trade contractors who have won transit work and owe the agency a cost- and resource-loaded Primavera P6 baseline, monthly updates and time impact analyses. And transit agencies, program managers and owner's representatives who want an independent read of a contractor's schedule or of their own program schedule before a board or funding partner sees it. We do not work both sides of the same contract.

What does a transit agency schedule specification usually require that a building spec does not?

Most transit agency specifications ask for a cost- and resource-loaded P6 schedule with the agency's activity coding, a narrative with every update, and a time impact analysis for every change or delay. Many also require the native P6 file (the XER), interface milestones with other contracts, track access or outage windows as scheduled activities, and systems integration testing and start-up shown in detail rather than as one bar. The baseline is built to the section the agency's reviewer will check it against and revised until the agency accepts it.

What is independent schedule review for a transit program?

A scheduler who does not work for the contractor or the program office reads the schedule as a schedule: logic, float, calendars, the paths to each funding and revenue service milestone, how integration testing and outages are modeled, and whether the monthly report says what the schedule says. The agency gets a written finding it can act on months before a date moves. It complements an in-house controls team; it does not replace it.

Can you report schedule float against our funding milestones, not just the revenue service date?

Yes. Full Funding Grant Agreement conditions, appropriation dates and local funding commitments are set up as milestones in the schedule, and each monthly review reports the float remaining on the path to each one. A path that loses float month after month is reported while re-sequencing or bridge funding is still a cheap decision.

How do you handle track outages, utility relocations and environmental review in the schedule?

As activities with durations, owners and the conditions that could reopen them, not as single milestones with fixed dates. A lost weekend outage is shown with the next available window, so the schedule prices what a missed window costs. Utility relocations carry the utility's own commitment dates. Environmental review, historic consultation and permit windows are shown as processes, with the work they release tied behind them.

What do you need to get started, and how fast is the quote?

For a contractor: the schedule specification, the contract milestones and the drawings, plus the agency's activity coding if it has one. For an agency or owner's representative: the contractor's current XER and narrative, or the program schedule and the last two monthly reports. You get a written quote with a firm price and delivery date, typically within 3 business days. The work is delivered remotely anywhere in the US.

Related Pages

Send the spec, or send the XER.
Get a firm number.

Written quote with a firm price and delivery date, typically within 3 business days. Talk to the scheduler, not a salesperson.

Get a Written Quote info@cpmpros.com
Get in Touch

Let’s talk about
your schedule

Whether you need a baseline developed, a delay analyzed, or an independent schedule review, we’re ready to engage. Scheduling is the only thing on our calendar.

ReachNationwide — fully remote across all U.S. markets
SoftwarePrimavera P6, Microsoft Project, Excel — all delivery formats
ResponseWritten quote typically within 3 business days